a = b – Talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I thought "Equals a to b" is clearer, as it shows that it is an active process, as "a equals b" sounds more like a comparison. But I'm neither a native speaker nor is this command that unclear ;) --[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 17:51, 16 December 2006 (CET) | I thought "Equals a to b" is clearer, as it shows that it is an active process, as "a equals b" sounds more like a comparison. But I'm neither a native speaker nor is this command that unclear ;) --[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 17:51, 16 December 2006 (CET) | ||
:How about this one: ''Assigns content of b to variable a.''. That should be pretty obvious to anybody, what it means. --[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 18:08, 16 December 2006 (CET) | :How about this one: ''Assigns content of b to variable a.''. That should be pretty obvious to anybody, what it means. --[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 18:08, 16 December 2006 (CET) | ||
::I think planck confused a = b and a == b. I agree with Kronzky, the new definition is much more clearer. --[[User:Sniperwolf572|Sniperwolf572]] 18:16, 16 December 2006 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 18:16, 16 December 2006
I thought "Equals a to b" is clearer, as it shows that it is an active process, as "a equals b" sounds more like a comparison. But I'm neither a native speaker nor is this command that unclear ;) --raedor 17:51, 16 December 2006 (CET)
- How about this one: Assigns content of b to variable a.. That should be pretty obvious to anybody, what it means. --Kronzky 18:08, 16 December 2006 (CET)
- I think planck confused a = b and a == b. I agree with Kronzky, the new definition is much more clearer. --Sniperwolf572 18:16, 16 December 2006 (CET)