BIS fnc codePerformance: Difference between revisions

From Bohemia Interactive Community
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "\[\[[cC]ategory:\{\{Name\|arma3\}\}: [fF]unctions\|\{\{uc:[a-z A-Z_]*\}\}\]\]" to "")
m (Text replacement - "\| *((\[\[[a-zA-Z0-9_ :\\\-\/|()]+\]\],? ?)+) * \}\}" to "|seealso= $1 }}")
Line 31: Line 31:
Compare three methods of adding elements into array
Compare three methods of adding elements into array


| [[diag_codePerformance]]
|seealso= [[diag_codePerformance]]
}}
}}



Revision as of 01:23, 17 February 2021

Hover & click on the images for description

Description

Description:
Description needed
Execution:
call
Groups:
Diagnostic

Syntax

Syntax:
Syntax needed
Parameters:
expression: String - Tested expression
arguments (Optional): Anything - Arguments to pass into the code. Default: []
cycles (Optional): Number - Number of wanted cycles. Default: 10000
display (Optional): Display - Display in which the message window with results will be opened. Use displayNull to disable the window. Default: Current mission display
Return Value:
Return value needed

Examples

Example 1:
testArray = []; ["testArray = testArray + [1]"] call BIS_fnc_codePerformance; testArray = []; ["testArray set [count testArray, 1]"] call BIS_fnc_codePerformance; testArray = []; ["testArray pushBack 1"] call BIS_fnc_codePerformance; Compare three methods of adding elements into array

Additional Information

See also:
diag_codePerformance

Notes

Report bugs on the Feedback Tracker and/or discuss them on the Arma Discord or on the Forums.
Only post proven facts here! Add Note