Ffur2007slx2 5 – User talk
(RE: Fred Gandt) |
Fred Gandt (talk | contribs) (→Edit Summaries: Thanks :-)) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Oh sorry Fred Gandt, I’ll add edit summaries from then on. And I’ll be appreciate if you can point out some mistakes I might make, thanks. ++ffur2007slx2_5 (talk) 13:42, 3 April 2014 (CEST) | Oh sorry Fred Gandt, I’ll add edit summaries from then on. And I’ll be appreciate if you can point out some mistakes I might make, thanks. ++ffur2007slx2_5 (talk) 13:42, 3 April 2014 (CEST) | ||
:There's certainly no need for "sorry" and ''mistakes'' can only be made if there's a ''right'' way. Wikis are perhaps the collaborative epitome of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisdom_of_the_crowd the wisdom of crowds], and for ''guidence'', Wikipedia is perhaps the epitome of wikis, and as such can be used as a yardstick. But in the end, whatever '''we''' do is ''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WIARM right]''. Thanks :-) -- [[User:Fred Gandt|Fred Gandt]] <span style="font-size:80%;vertical-align:3px;line-height:0px;">([[User talk:Fred Gandt|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Fred Gandt|contribs]])</span> 08:13, 3 April 2014 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 08:13, 3 April 2014
Hi, regarding your comment in isClass - BIS_fnc_getCfgIsClass is a function created specifically for A3 campaign and is in no way intended as a replacement for isClass command. Could you please modify your comment? ++Str (talk) 10:22, 1 April 2014 (CEST)
Thanks Karel, modified, could you please check it? ++ffur2007slx2_5 (talk) 15:02, 2 April 2014 (CEST)
Edit Summaries
Hi Ffur. Although this is arguably not of great importance, could I ask that you add a concise edit summary (e.g. "Added note", "Fixed spelling" or "Linked <code>" etc.) for your edits? It helps current and future editors understand a page's history and RecentChanges is far more useful with edit summaries. I would agree that the content is far more important than the circumstances, but we're building documentation, and the documentation about how we're doing it has its own value. Docuception! ;-) -- Fred Gandt (talk) 23:48, 2 April 2014 (CEST)
Oh sorry Fred Gandt, I’ll add edit summaries from then on. And I’ll be appreciate if you can point out some mistakes I might make, thanks. ++ffur2007slx2_5 (talk) 13:42, 3 April 2014 (CEST)
- There's certainly no need for "sorry" and mistakes can only be made if there's a right way. Wikis are perhaps the collaborative epitome of the wisdom of crowds, and for guidence, Wikipedia is perhaps the epitome of wikis, and as such can be used as a yardstick. But in the end, whatever we do is right. Thanks :-) -- Fred Gandt (talk/contribs) 08:13, 3 April 2014 (CEST)