setOwner: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Lou Montana (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "<code>([^ ]*)\[\[([a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\]\]([^ ]*)<\/code>" to "<code>$1$2$3</code>") |
Lou Montana (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "\|x([0-9])= *<code>([^<]*)<\/code>" to "|x$1= <sqf>$2</sqf>") |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
|x1= <sqf>_someObject setOwner 12;</sqf> | |x1= <sqf>_someObject setOwner 12;</sqf> | ||
|x2= < | |x2= <sqf>_someObject setOwner (owner _playerObject);</sqf> | ||
|seealso= [[owner]] [[setGroupOwner]] [[groupOwner]] [[didJIPOwner]] | |seealso= [[owner]] [[setGroupOwner]] [[groupOwner]] [[didJIPOwner]] | ||
Revision as of 11:24, 13 May 2022
Description
- Description:
- From server machine, change the ownership of an object to a given client. Using command in an unintended way will log a message to .rpt file. To transfer ownership of all AI units in a group properly, use setGroupOwner instead.
- Problems:
Since Arma 3 v1.40, this command should not be used to transfer ownership of units with AI with the exception of agents.- Groups:
- Multiplayer
Syntax
- Syntax:
- object setOwner clientID
- Parameters:
- object: Object - Object to transfer
- clientID: Number - The machine network ID of the new owner.
- Return Value:
- Boolean - Returns true if ownership was successfully transferred, otherwise false
Examples
- Example 1:
- _someObject setOwner 12;
- Example 2:
Additional Information
- See also:
- owner setGroupOwner groupOwner didJIPOwner
Notes
-
Report bugs on the Feedback Tracker and/or discuss them on the Arma Discord or on the Forums.
Only post proven facts here! Add Note
- Posted on August 22, 2017 - 18:56 (UTC)
- Demellion
-
NOTE: There are some interesting behaviour about the specific owner digits like 0 -2 and 2:
- Any mission objects (generated from SQM) initially have 0 owner state, but it is not local to ANYONE (0) like it is expected to be, but actually only to a SERVER (2). You can't make any object owner to be 0 once it was changed.
- Trying to change ownership to any negative digit will always result in attempt to transfer ownership to SERVER (2). Once it is unit (non-agent) it will fail and revert* to initial ownership.
- *Changing ownership of a unit (non-agent) actually gives a result for a brief time after this action is performed. What actually happens next - ownership is getting reverted with a message to RPT of a server. This can be seen by reading results of (owner _object) in really fast cycle.
- Posted on February 12, 2019 - 01:15 (UTC)
- jonpas
- Prints RPT warning "setGroupOwner should be used" as soon as there is one unit inside the vehicle, but performs the action successfully.