isEqualTo – Talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Lou Montana (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "<code> +" to "<code>") |
Lou Montana (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "Killzone Kid" to "Killzone_Kid") |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<dl> | <dl> | ||
<dd class="notedate">Posted on Apr 15, 2014 - 16:24</dd> | <dd class="notedate">Posted on Apr 15, 2014 - 16:24</dd> | ||
<dt class="note">'''[[User:ffur2007slx2_5|ffur2007slx2_5]]'''<dd class="note"> | <dt class="note">'''[[User:ffur2007slx2_5|ffur2007slx2_5]]'''<dd class="note"> | ||
(ArmA3 1.16) for multiple comparisons, we can use the example below for more accurate compare than [[BIS_fnc_arrayCompare]] or [[BIS_fnc_areEqual]]: | (ArmA3 1.16) for multiple comparisons, we can use the example below for more accurate compare than [[BIS_fnc_arrayCompare]] or [[BIS_fnc_areEqual]]: | ||
<code>fnc_areEqual = { | <code style="display: block">fnc_areEqual = { | ||
[[private]] ["_b","_var1","_var2"]; | [[private]] ["_b","_var1","_var2"]; | ||
_b = [[true]]; | _b = [[true]]; | ||
Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
["A","a","a"] [[call]] [[BIS_fnc_areEqual]]; // true | ["A","a","a"] [[call]] [[BIS_fnc_areEqual]]; // true | ||
</code> | </code> | ||
</dd> | </dd> | ||
</dl> | </dl> | ||
Moved this note here, after testing performance of this solution, To compare, where BIS_fnc_areEqual which is pretty slow takes 0.66ms to complete, this ^^^^ one takes 333.65ms. [[User: | Moved this note here, after testing performance of this solution, To compare, where BIS_fnc_areEqual which is pretty slow takes 0.66ms to complete, this ^^^^ one takes 333.65ms. [[User:Killzone_Kid|Killzone_Kid]] ([[User talk:Killzone_Kid|talk]]) 13:39, 21 May 2015 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 13:48, 12 March 2024
- Posted on Apr 15, 2014 - 16:24
- ffur2007slx2_5
-
(ArmA3 1.16) for multiple comparisons, we can use the example below for more accurate compare than BIS_fnc_arrayCompare or BIS_fnc_areEqual:
fnc_areEqual = { private ["_b","_var1","_var2"]; _b = true; for [{_i = 1},{_i < (count _this) && _b},{_i = _i + 1}] do { _var1 = _this select (_i-1); _var2 = _this select _i; if (!(_var1 isEqualTo _var2)) then {_b = false;}; }; _b }; ["A","a","a"] call fnc_areEqual; // false ["A","a","a"] call BIS_fnc_areEqual; // true
Moved this note here, after testing performance of this solution, To compare, where BIS_fnc_areEqual which is pretty slow takes 0.66ms to complete, this ^^^^ one takes 333.65ms. Killzone_Kid (talk) 13:39, 21 May 2015 (CEST)